Видео

Daniel Dennett is simply disappointing.

THE CULT OF GABOR MATE. This is really shocking...how many followers he has 😮

Can someone put the setlist here

it is easy to observe different societies and complexity, variation in nature. it is through human exceptionalism that we maintain this distructive miths...

We, husband and 2 kids, 5.5 and 3 years old went to this diplomatic mission. It was not the previous ones. There was a 79 revolution behind our story. 2 years after the beginning we were done. Husband, the magestic young diplomat started to turning a ghost, not possible to leave and give the keys to the embasswho was looking after Mullahs' Interest, nor infesting le grand Maroc. I had to stay strong, but how to take care of now 3 kids and a husband nearly dead!. That new baby is now in psychiatric hospital. I am under another version of help. My first child now 40+ is a successful girl, in fact socially all gave done well, but...I still work and try to live a normal day to day, creating new writing projects, but...

ruclips.net/user/shortsI-JTUTzOAmY?si=QWdv9d0_kJ8t1_HJ

...I am thinking that in order to get to a destination we need to have some kind of compass, whether that is borrowed, built-in or even being manufactured in accordance to the data you are hoarding up. I would have thought that the argument should be what came first , the hen or the egg. So maybe whether the notion of the existence of ' God ' is even palpable. I loved the debate and hats off to ' How To Academy' for this brilliant topic. I am of the view that you need to understand boundaries. I mean a traveller walking on his journey gets detained by the 'border' guards. They say ''you have entered their country illegally. The path the traveller took had no signs and had no way of knowing that he has trespassed by an inch . If true then yes the guards are doing their job and rightly so to. But if the traveller had no way of knowing that if I step an inch further , I am entering let's say for arguments the Muslim city Mecca. Because non-muslims do travel to Saudi Arabia but can not enter Mecca. So I work in the country and decide to walk in a direction. There are no roads or signs in this supposition. Hav I 'broken' a rule/law ? . Because the law says that in order for a crime to be committed there must be intent and then the 'physical' act. But in my example yes I went over into the territory by an inch. I admit to doing the physical act. But I had no deliberate intention to step into Mecca. I did not 'design or draw the map boundaries.Now what? The point I am intending to make is that I am only 'responsible' for the acts I physically do. Just imagine a scene from the 'quantum leap' series. So let's say you are thrown somewhere. And you find yourself surrounded by doors that lead you to somewhere the unknown. Now everything depends on you to work out what risks you are willing to take. On one door there is a sign ‘Death’ . On another door is a sign ‘Success’. On another door ‘Adventure’ …etc. Now in this supposition I can read . If the state of my mind is to put myself out of misery, I will naturally enter the door of death. If I have been a failure in the past, the door Success will be very desirable. On the other hand I like an adventure because I am from the lineage of say ‘Sinbad the sailor’, I am more likely to open the door leading to an Adventure. But lets pause here for a moment. What if someone else has been here before me. What if they had played around with the door signs? . I have no way of knowing. On the other hand I cant read the signs. I am doomed from the start. But I know I have no control of the past. I have ‘free will’ from here on. And of-course, whatever risks I take, the consequences will be of my own doing. I share a quote with you here if I may: “ Instead of worrying about what you cannot control, shift your energy to what you can create ." - Roy Bennet

I have a question about NARM. I have cptsd, abuse amnesia/dissociation, anxiety, and depression. I've been in sessions for 2 months. My therapist starts out by asking what I want for myself, then has me talk about what I'm going through, with the pauses to sit with the feelings. Just when I am the most emotional and upset and at the topmost branch of the trauma tree, the session ends, he recaps what happened and it's over. I'm left with all the feelings and flooding and no way to get back down, no direction or guidance. Then I take a shower and nap, start dissociating and lose the memory of the session, and am very sensitive and extra reliant on my service dog for a few days. Is that how NARM is supposed to go?

David is absolutely right on the art history thing. The roman statues objectively look like a person. The portrait of Henry the 8th objectively looks like a person. The painting of Æthelred objectively does not look like a person.

Why is this woman being given these platforms?

I actually had vivid dreams in which i was doing math quotations I have never seen before, it was in 2020. I am not scientist but I like maths I believe it is thge key to all the answers about universe.

A tool is just as good as the user that uses the tool.

Having a predictable or familiar companion when talking about dreams from patients who are 80-90 seems odd to me. I've felt my dreams have been along those lines since 8 years old.

It seems like the interviewer isn’t listening. I hope this gets better.

I think you can't say with certainty, dreams can't predict future happenings except in one case,. "There are stranger things in heaven and earth than are imagined in your philosophy, Horatio." (Hamlet) You say prediction dreams come from an assumption of a god or gods being in control. Not necessarily so.The report of these "spooky" things is periennial; when "god died" the reports did not stop. There are more frontiers to be explored, and one of the frontiers is our human ability to sense "spooky" things in "spooky" ways on occasion. I am delighted with your work describing and quantifying brain functions, and, by and large, I am impressed with your humility. But remember you are only approaching one frontier, and, as a scientist, have no basis for such a categorical statement- scientific hubris. I think,"We have no evidence dreams can predict the future" is a more defensible scientific statement.

Trauma=wound Trauma isn't what happened to you, it's what happened inside of you as a result of what happened to you It's what meaning you gave to what happened .... It is embedded in the nervous system and body And we end up carrying it around, and it can drive our behaviour

Trauma. It need not be a life sentence. It’s a choice. Going within, releasing to soul. Or consciousness if you prefer. Find love and forgiveness for you.

The mediator seems to consider his own show foolish.

This Robert guy uses his intuition about how he would be thinking if he lived in the past, to argue that intuition is often mistaken. So why is he intuiting such a thing, he is probably wrong. According to himself.

What argument is it to say that that it is our past experience and Biology makes your choices not free? According to his argument one could never change their mind or opinion. I believe our free will makes it possible for us to change our mind.

Yes, and when a new fetus makes a decision , it was its past life that caused it to choose what he chose.

I do not need any genius to tell me if we have free will. Consciousness existed before the Big Bang. The Big Bang itself was an act of free will.

It gotta be frustrating when one has devoted his entire life to trying to righting the wrongs of humanity, knowing that the world is driven by hatred, vengeance, ideology, wealth and power, and no amount of bench pressing logic, will change those driven by madness….for when everyone is right, then everyone is wrong, for god, if God even exist, does not take sides, like earths climate, a natural disaster, or a nuclear holocaust, everyone will lose, but a true psychopath doesn’t care….

Dear Alan, I was a theatre maker. Iam now a writer. Sincerely. Your a life saver. Life is not easy and you positively inspire and help my process. Most excellent and helpful. All my appreciation.

Sing time

Denett truely does not what he talking about and havent done any homework, all he does advocate liberal agenda, which is compeletly bs. so does not care about humanity at all. on the other hand Robert is an honest guy and is walking on the path of truth.

reed jobs , your thoughts ?

Eve jobs , your thoughts ?

your way to vague and useless to me , how many hours did you work when you were employed and how much do you make with your social security retirement ? As my mom lives in poverty and she probably worked ten times harder then you , Bernie your a fake and trumps method to ease the pain to avoid a takeover of the gift in a civil way , daves right your wasting our time and idvlike to sleep sometime tonite , i hope your not in bed .

Dr. Rahul Jandial is so impressive to me that I looked him up. He is a Scientist, Professor, Brain Surgeon/Neuroscientist and Author whose book has been translated into 20+ languages. He is an American. His Alma Mater is UC Berkeley and is 51 years old.

I have to say (2:47) "eliminating" your stressor for addiction for 30 days must sound simple from a clinical perspective, but there's no advice on how to do that exactly! That is the core problem ffs! Oh really, I can just stop overworking for 30 days if I want to? Gee, thanks... and the whole "you'll feel worse before you feel better" line makes it even worse. So not only are we supposed to stop doing the thing we're addicted to through nothing but willpower, but it'll suck when we start doing it - the most important time for it to resolve as a habit. Seriously, medical professionals that don't have lived-with experience aren't very useful.

This is actually very helpful

They never defined free will. Yawn.

Fascinating debate. My 2 cents: Dan's view is that the "executive function" (free will ) is a product of evolution. Robert agrees, but makes the cogent point that evolution has "evolved" from purely genetic to epigenetic factors (via PFC) that shape you into the agent that executes free will... and hence you are not responsible for the *quality* of free will that you execute. In his words, "How did you become that person who made that choice?". And so the term "free will" is somewhat of a red herring. You do make a choice, but you do not control the type of choice you make. And in society we judge people for the choices they make, without consideration for how the machine evolved to make that choice... which, Robert argues, you have *no control* over. We don't attribute malice to a lion defending its territory or a male chimp killing all the competing males (including children), because we understand the evolutionary imperative there. But we do judge people who (drastically) disrupt human societies and attribute malice to them... and the path to compassion there is to really understand that they are not responsible for who they became.

This video and another rituals compiled can make you fall asleep easier such as limit caffeine, vitamin d .........

For those who are interested in those small details: It took him 50 minutes to take the first sip of his water bottle.

Because he was part of Tony Blair criminal gang that was responsible for starting a war and killing hundreds of thousands in Iraq. It is gang mentality. Long live Palestine.

Darwin knew only a little about electricity, nothing about electromagnetism and absolutely nothing, which is the case today, about magnetism and nothing about forces and how they operate. All he knew was biology, so are we to place biology as the entirety of reality. It is a stretch and it doesn’t hold up, not at the cusp of a quantum age the idea that what is elemental or biological is the nature of reality appears quaint.

The problem here is that Consciousness is all there and God is all there is, so consciousness; Cosmic Consciousness and what is called God, is one and the same. This is what Mr. Dawkins does not comprehend. That Consciousness would not be aware of Itself is naive. A consciousness that doesn’t know itself is god in man, the microcosm of the macrocosm. Reason cannot comprehend the whole of life, of consciousness, it is too limited and Mr Dawkins is right in that, reason cannot comprehend Cosmic Consciousness much less experience it.. It would be like trying to fit the whole ocean into a small lake. Mr. Lightman is correct Cosmic Consciousness is real and human consciousness shares in it and it has been the case that some humans have experienced temporarily or became fully established in it. There have been numerous accounts of this and they all match and validate each other. God is the universe and is also transcendent to it. It is not either/or it is and/both and the human mind has a tendency to think that it has to be this or that but not both simultaneously. In the higher ages people who could understand matter only were put sweeping the streets.

God is Consciousness and consciousness is ‘the hard problem.’ Neither science nor philosophy can measure or explain it as it s fundamental.

Dennett came in pissed off and got more pissed off because of his lack of 'Agency'. Dennett is also showing faith based Dogmatism. (Sad end to a great thinker)

Thanks for sharing.

A lot of Beard’s arguments amount to milquetoast political grievances. They’re not insightful after testing, just petty snipes.

i freaking love this

There is no self. And of course nobody knows that. Nobody knows anything. The mind exists in duality. Duality is an an illusion.

There is most definitely a future for the people remaining on this planet, but it is unlikely to include Israel or the United States.

It seems like most of Dennett’s arguments are coming from more of an emotional standpoint rather than a rational standpoint

For these ideas, i guess is why the people in power murdered the chief Rabi. 😢

You can almost feel Mary's pain when she walks. Poor ladies hips seem wrecked. But what a jolly nice exccentric she is. And David? crackin wee fella! I am pretty sure the male love of Romans must be an English Phenomenon. Perhaps a form of historical Stockholm Syndrome? For, here in Scotland, we men tend to despise Romans. I certainly do. Yeh, OK, I see the ''good'' that came, but..., kings, queens, emperors? Self-legitimized mafia dons really.

The host appears to meditate too much. He has a spaced out look in his eyes. It’s intense.